Giving tennis more than a shot

Wave Of Shock In Smurfland

I cannot remember when Rafael Nadal has squandered a two-break lead on clay in a deciding set before. Today, however, he did. Up 5-2 in the third set against Fernando Verdasco, against whom he was on a stretch of 13 consecutive wins, he lost his advantage and in the end, it’s the Madrid native who finally logged a win against Nadal, triumphing 6-3 3-6 7-5 in 3:10.

 

Verdasco fully deserved the win despite not playing his best for the most part of the second and third sets. Out of sheer joy, he collapsed on the court as though he had just won the tournament, kissed the blue clay, and was seen crying with the pure happiness of having finally had the better of the one whom he called the best clay court player of all times. “The biggest win of my career”, he said. And it really was.

 

Happy, Fernando Verdasco, to finally beat Rafael Nadal after 13 straight losses? He even kissed the blue clay thank you! (Photo: Mike Hewitt/Getty Images)

 

Nadal threatens not to play next year, joined by Djokovic

It was nonetheless a wave of shock in Madrid today, seeing Nadal lose so early in a clay court event, even though the surface plays a lot more like a hard court than a clay court. Since it moved from indoor hard to clay, Madrid has always been faster than the other clay tournaments, due to the altitude. However, this year, it seems even worse than usual. Is it because of the blue dye? Is it because of bad maintenance? Perhaps a combination of both? I can’t tell.

 

What I can tell is that the dissatisfaction of the players is almost unanimous. It escalated to a whole new level today after Rafa’s defeat. The Spaniard was not very tender in his appreciation of the surface:

 

“Being able to move is very important for me and if I can’t move well, I can’t hit the ball well either. […] This surface destabilizes the game. It is a completely different game and I don’t want to take risks.”

 

He actually went even further in his declarations, even hinting about next year:

 

“If things don’t change next year, this will be one less tournament on the calendar for me.”

 

Some people found him pretty whiny as, after all, he had just lost in the round-of-16 of a tournament he’s always disliked, but the problem is that a few hours later, after defeating Stanislas Wawrinka 7-6(5) 6-4, World no 1 and defending champion Novak Djokovic joined Nadal in his will to boycott the event next year if things don’t change and berating the tournament, implying they lied to them about the surface: 

 

“I’ve read all of the papers they have given me. They’re claiming the court is the same. It’s not true. […] The winner is the one who won’t finish injured at the end of the week. We hope this experience is the last one.”

 

For his part, Roger Federer has also voiced some criticism towards the surface after yesterday’s hard-fought victory against Milos Raonic. Asked about why he served and volleyed so much after the first set, the Swiss mentioned that the baseline was so slippery that moving forward was, for him, the only option to avoid tripping.

 

As a matter of fact, this match was much closer to a hard court encounter than a clay match, as the Canadian served no less than 21 aces, not much less than his average in a three-setter on hard, and there were no  more than 10 real rallies in the whole match. Those are not numbers you’ll see on a clay court.

 

In fact, a lot of the statistics are not common to clay court events, or even to what Madrid was in the previous years. More aces for a lot of players (Rafa Nadal even signed his best aces per match performances of the season, for instance), winners that we about never see on a clay court, short rallies, etc. Nothing to make it feel like clay.

 

Where I agree with Nadal and Djokovic in the idea of a boycott if things don’t change is that Madrid is held about two weeks prior to the French Open, which is like, as Rafa said, making players play Cincinnati on grass prior to the US Open. With Madrid playing as it’s been since the beginning, and the worsening we’ve seen this season, what would likely be ideal is that Monte Carlo and Madrid should switch places in the calendar and that Madrid should become the optional Masters 1000.

 

Then let Ion Tiriac gloat in his own idées de grandeur and try silly things like phosphorescent balls (his last eccentricity) and blue ice-like clay. This way, players could just drop Madrid without being penalized in the end.

 

Similar posts
  • Djokovic and Nadal: the Fight for the... The ATP500 tournament of Beijing has started today and the talk, this week, is whether or not Rafael Nadal will overtake the top of the rankings from Novak Djokovic. Whether? No. When. First of all, we have to make one thing certain: the change of the guard on top of the ATP World Tour rankings [...]
  • Opinion – Koellerer Lashes Out ... He was perhaps banned for life by the Tennis Integrity Unit (TIU) for match-fixing, but Daniel Koellerer continues to talk, and to talk a lot. This time, he lashed out on Rafael Nadal and David Ferrer, particularly on the former, accusing him of doping: “Let’s take Rafael Nadal. It’s not possible that he tested negative. [...]
  • Davis Cup – The End of a Great ... . Canada’s dream Davis Cup run ended in a dramatic fifth rubber, on an absolutely spectacular point that might have terrible consequences for one of the protagonists. It was a diving contest between Vasek Pospisil and Janko Tipsarevic, on the latter’s fifth match point, ending up a 7-6(3), 6-2, 7-6(6) win for Tipsarevic and a [...]
  • Davis Cup – Canada One Win Away... After Friday’s singles, in which logic prevailed, although barely in the case of Milos Raonic, Saturday’s doubles rubber became a must-win for Canada if they wanted to keep their hopes alive in the semifinal opposing them to Serbia. Djokovic dominates logically Novak Djokovic, despite having played the U.S. Open final only four days before and [...]
  • Davis Cup Semifinals – Underdog... The Davis Cup semifinals both appear, on paper, to greatly favour the local teams. It is a matter of surface chosen. It is a question of players present. And it makes both visiting teams appear like huge underdogs in the end. However, if either of Argentina or Canada did not believe that they can pull [...]

6 Comments

  1. Katarina_YYZ Katarina_YYZ
    11 May, 2012    

    I like your suggestion at the end.
    Actually I’d change the optional/mandatory thing to this: instead of making one mandatory and the other optional, the ATP could say “you must play 2 out of 3 clay Masters; each player can choose which 2 they want.”
    I think the optional vs mandatory Masters thing is sort of a non-issue at this point. Monte Carlo has had a good field every year since it became optional. The players put pressure on each other by attending all these tournaments (you will fall behind in points if you don’t play enough). Dubai is non-mandatory yet draws at least 2 of the top 5 each year.

  2. 11 May, 2012    

    For Dubaï it’s a bit different, as the players also receive big bonuses for attending, which is why the field is so great year after year. (Appearance fees that are not counted in the prize money an event gives.)

    As for Monte Carlo, players also like the venue and the tournament, which helps. They’re very well treated there and the venue is one of the most beautiful of the Tour. This year, the problems with the court were a (preoccupying?) exception, but overall, it’s really liked. It’s never been the case for Madrid, because of the altitude. So close to the French Open, it cannot even be considered as prep, in my opinion. Which is what prompted my suggestion to swap both events and their status as well.

  3. mat4 mat4
    11 May, 2012    

    Caroline,

    There are quite a few things confusing me. First, the altitude. I tried to check and from what I have seen, the speed of the ball should increase about 6 or 7% at 600 m. It is not that much. I rather think that the court surface was the main reason for that tournament to be different the years before. There was that also Verdasco’s statement that the courts in Madrid were always slippery. They looked certainly faster.

    But then, in a country with such a tennis tradition, with so many clay courts, I can’t imagine that they are not able to prepare the courts adequately, neither can I imagine that this blue stuff wasn’t tested extensively beforehand. They had Moya there, at least, to advise the organisers.

    How could this all happen?

  4. 11 May, 2012    

    I think that if we knew how this all happened, it would be fixed by now. But yes, the surface has been cr*p every year since the tournament became a clay event.

    This year, apart from the surface that was quick again, just like the previous years, and full of holes of all kind, it was also extremely slippery so the players didn’t have the necessary support to hit normal shots. Plus, it really plays more like hard courts than like clay. So putting this tournament at this stage of the European Clay Swing isn’t the most ideal thing to do, in my opinion.

  5. mat4 mat4
    20 May, 2012    

    Caroline,

    in the radio emission “Radio tennis play” Julien Benneteau talks quite openly about the Madrid courts.

    It is here, very interesting stuff:
    http://fr.sports.yahoo.com/blogs/jeu-decisif/radio-tennis-play-julien-benneteau-choix-capitaine-n-090038893.html

  6. 20 May, 2012    

    Thanks! Interesting interview!

Partners

   

Categories

   

Past Articles